Targets rental vacancy above 5%, quicker permits, co-operative housing and community land trusts. Proposes lower development charges supported by infrastructure financing, family-oriented midrise housing and neighbourhood shops. [51]
START WITH WHAT MATTERS
One issue. Every perspective.
Read the stated positions and their sources. An unknown position is not opposition.
Housing & growth
25 of 37 with a sourced position
Supports faster approvals, lower development charges and looser rental rules. Supports tenant protections; co-ops and land trusts require transparent governance and lasting affordability. [403]
Supports faster approvals and varied infill. Development-charge changes must protect existing taxpayers; rental-rule flexibility depends on neighbourhood impacts. Housing partnerships require public benefit. Opposes stronger municipal tenant protections as asked. [399]
Favours retaining existing middle housing, neighbourhood-appropriate heights, heritage protection and ending ten-year market-rental tax exemptions. [25]
Supports faster approvals, lower development charges, housing co-ops and tenant protections. Short-term rental flexibility depends on location. Support for neighbourhood shops remains conditional without a further explanation. [405]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Photo unavailable for Daniel Fritter
City council
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Photo unavailable for Mike Rose
City council
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Favours targeted four-to-six-storey corridors, infrastructure readiness and transparent tracking of housing incentives. Would evaluate City land for nonprofit, co-op and middle-income housing. [68]
Would accelerate approvals and expand housing choices through responsible growth. [58]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Photo unavailable for Todd Daniels
City council
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Would review rental incentives against affordability, unit size and vacancy, and require an identifiable public benefit. [31]
Proposes family-sized and accessible homes, inclusionary housing, anti-renoviction measures and conditional restrictions on investor short-term rentals. [73]
Faster approvals depend on OCP compliance and infrastructure. Lower development charges require funding safeguards. Supports looser rental rules and co-ops; tenant protections undecided. [404]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Supports development that fits neighbourhood character and reasonable development cost charges. [44]
Proposes faster approvals in serviced areas and targeted development-charge reductions protecting existing taxpayers. Supports looser short-term rental rules, co-ops and land trusts; opposes stronger tenant protections as asked. [401]
He supports preserving rental housing and assessing co-operative housing and land-trust proposals for cost, feasibility and public benefit. Further tenant protections depend on evidence and City authority. [414]
Supports a range of affordable housing and growth paced with infrastructure and amenities. [70]
Favours housing choice and coordinated growth. Proposes exploring infrastructure-cost amortization with provincial cooperation. Rental-rule changes should protect long-term housing; housing partnerships and tenant protections are conditional. [398]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Photo unavailable for Rob Wilkinson
City council
Would restore older homes, reuse vacant lots, enable legal suites and reduce permitting barriers. [62]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Supports housing partnerships and tenant protections. Faster approvals and lower development charges depend on growth funding its costs; rental-rule changes require closer study. [402]
Would coordinate housing, transportation and infrastructure while protecting quality of life. [60]
Supports attainable housing through public, private and non-profit partnerships. [353]
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Photo unavailable for Silverado Socrates
City council
Review status not recorded for this section. Missing information does not establish a position. Submit information or a correction ↗
Campaign-linked PDF favours low- and midrise growth in urban centres and transit corridors, rather than sprawl. Election year of the linked document is unclear. [56]
Supports rental and family-sized homes that fit neighbourhoods and opposes towers she considers out of scale. [97]
Re-election reporting highlights work on tenant displacement protections and neighbourhood impacts. A detailed new 2026 housing programme was not verified. [77]
Supports faster approvals and lower development charges. Short-term rental changes depend on rules and enforcement. Co-operative housing and land trusts require demonstrated benefit, accountability and appropriate eligibility. [393]
Supports simpler housing approvals. Would consider lower development charges only with a plan to fund infrastructure without transferring development costs to existing taxpayers. Supports credible service-capacity planning rather than requiring all infrastructure to be built before approval; rental rules and additional tenant protections require review. [407]
Approval reform depends on neighbourhood character. Supports housing partnerships and tenant protection; cautions against shifting development costs to existing taxpayers. [397]